The Governor's dilemma : indirect governance beyond principals and agents / edited by Kenneth W. Abbott ... [et al.].
Material type:
TextPublication details: Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2020.Description: viii, 301 p. : illISBN: - 0198855052 (hbk.)
- 9780198855057 (hbk.)
- 0198855060 (pbk.)
- 9780198855064 (pbk.)
- JF1351 .G687 2020
| Item type | Home library | Shelving location | Call number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Punsarn Library | General Stacks | JF1351 .G687 2020 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | PNLIB21060740 |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Part I Theoretical framework -- 1. Competence-control theory / Kenneth W. Abbott, Philipp Genschel, Duncan Snidal, and Bernhard Zangl -- Part II Governing violence -- 2. The governor's dilemma in colonial empires / Paul K. MacDonald -- 3. The authoritarian governor's dilemma / Henry Thomson -- 4. Competence over control / Alexander Thompson -- 5. Militias and the Iraqi State / Idean Salehyan -- 6. The invader's dilemma / Henning Tamm -- 7. Governing private security companies / Andreas Kruck -- Part III Governing markets -- 8. Governing capital markets / Jack Seddon and Walter Mattli -- 9. Balancing competence and control / Felix Biermann and Berthold Rittberger -- 10. Indirect governance in global financial regulation / Thomas Rixen and Lora Anne Viola -- 11. Managing the Eurozone crisis / Manuela Moschella -- 12. governing markets in autocratic regimes / Johannes Gerschewski -- Part IV Implications for democracy -- 13. Trump's dilemma / Mark A. Pollack.
The Governor's Dilemma develops a general theory of indirect governance based on the tradeoff between governor control and intermediary competence; the empirical chapters apply that theory to a diverse range of cases encompassing both nternational relations and comparative politics. The theoretical framework paper starts from the observation that virtually all governance is indirect, carried out through intermediaries. But governors in indirect governance relationships face a dilemma: competent intermediaries gain power from the competencies they contribute, making them difficult to control, while efforts to control intermediary behavor limit important intermediary competencies, including expertise, credibility, and legitimacy. Thus, governors can obtain either high intermediary competence or strong control, but not both. This competence-control tradeoff is a common condition of indirect governance, whether governors are domestic or international, public or private, democratic or authoritarian; and whether governance addresses economic, security, or social issues. The empirical chapters analyze the operation and implications of the governor's dilemma in cases involving the governance of violence (e.g., secret police, support for foreign rebel groups, private security companies), the governance of markets (e.g., the Euro crisis, capital markets, EU regulation, the G20), and cross-cutting governance issues (colonial empires, <"Trump's Dilemma>"). Competence-control theory helps explain many features of governance that other theories cannot: why indirect governance is not limited to principal-agent delegation, but takes multiple forms; why governors create seemingly counter-productive intermediary relationships; and why indirect governance is frequently unstable over time.
There are no comments on this title.
