| 000 | 02017cam a2200337 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | on1155483927 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | 212025s2020 enk b 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | _a 2020014767 | ||
| 020 | _a9781108836067 (hbk.) | ||
| 020 | _a1108836062 (hbk.) | ||
| 020 | _a9781108799294 (pbk.) | ||
| 020 | _a1108799299 (hbk.) | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1155483927 | ||
| 050 |
_aHM1111 _b.R33 2020 |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_aRadzik, Linda, _d1970- |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe ethics of social punishment : _bthe enforcement of morality in everyday life / _cLinda Radzik ; with Christopher Bennett, Glen Pettigrove, George Sher. |
| 260 |
_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; _aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _c2020. |
||
| 300 | _axiii, 165 p. | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 520 | _a""This volume makes social punishment the central category of analysis. The philosophical literature on punishment is so wholly concentrated on the state's responses to crime that authors sometimes dismiss talk of punishment in everyday life as merely metaphorical. But this is mistaken. Legal norms are not the only ones that society enforces and the mechanisms of law are not the only methods of enforcement that society uses. This work argues that at least many instances of rebuke, social withdrawal, boycotting, and public shaming should be interpreted as cases of punishment. It argues that the general justifying aim of informal social punishments, such as these, is to morally pressure wrongdoers to make amends. Yet the legitimacy of using social punishment also turns on the tension between individual desert and social good, as well as the possession of an authority to punish". | ||
| 650 | 4 |
_aSocial acceptance _xMoral and ethical aspects. |
|
| 650 | 4 | _aSocial isolation. | |
| 650 | 4 |
_aPunishment _xSocial aspects. |
|
| 650 | 4 | _aJudgment (Ethics) | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aBennett, Christopher, _d1972- |
|
| 700 | 1 | _aPettigrove, Glen. | |
| 700 | 1 | _aSher, George. | |
| 942 |
_2lcc _cBK |
||
| 999 |
_c356 _d356 |
||